The recent Emerald Cup’s 2016 California cannabis legalization panel might have been in the only hall of the Santa Rosa Fairgrounds not giving off skunkweed, however there was still a lot of energetic buzz amongst the half dozen speakers. For the first time, the often competitive factions of the state’s marijuana activity were sitting at the very same table, discussing what a developed legalization step may look like.

2015-01-06-LegalizationPanel.jpg
The 2016 Legalization Panel (picture by Jonathan Greenberg)

Fortunately for the California economy and for the countless individuals who delight in what may be the state’s biggest money crop is that it seems highly likely that a 2016 legalization measure will pass. In 2010, Proposition 19 failed with 46.5 percent of the vote. However a poll last year, following the effective legalization initiatives in Colorado and Washington, discovered that 65 percent of Californians are now most likely to vote yes to end cannabis prohibition.

The huge thought to the Emerald Cup panelists on December 14 was not whether the state’s voters will certainly legalize in 2016, but how California’s legal marijuana market will certainly work. The panel brought together representatives of the country’s biggest legalization organizations (the Drug Policy Alliance and Marijuana Policy Project), as well as California’s leading activists and attorneys. This brand-new year will be the time when the information of the country’s largest cannabis legalization bill will certainly be straightened out.

Steve DeAngelo, the pony-tailed creator of Harborside University hospital (the state’s largest medicinal dispensary) and the uncrowned king of California marijuana reform, took the lead role as consensus contractor. “We’ve got to put our histories aside and come together,” DeAngelo stated. “The only way we get this done is if we do it California style. All of us sit-down in a circle and we speak to each other until we have actually figured it out. If we don’t, our California values of respect for nature, looking after our neighbors, and diversity, will be squashed.”

DeAngelo and other panelists cautioned that without a collective agreement file that represents advocacy organizations, growers, consumers, the jailed, industry workers and the state, lobbyists for Big Tobacco or casino or agribusiness will relocate and produce their own legalization expense that would control and transform the industry.

“If we don’t do it, they’ll do it their way,” DeAngelo said. “We’ve got to make damned sure that policies safeguard the people who constructed this industry.” DeAngelo wants to adopt Colorado’s policy of prohibiting out-of-state investors and growers for 3 years post legalization. He also believes that small growers ought to be taxed at lower rates than big corporations, which size limitations for cannabis farms might likewise work.

This technique is widely supported. “We have to be politically active and create a solution, so that the people who are now doing what they’re doing at least have a chance to be grandfathered in,” stated a Northern California female who has managed a small growing operation for years. “We shouldn’t need to be purchasing a $250,000 growing license. That’s a consolidation of wealth; that’s not a free enterprise any longer.” (After Colorado’s legalization, Time magazine reported that deposits, applications and licensing costs for a legal grow there could go beyond $500,000).

Omar Figueroa, a popular anti-prohibition attorney based in Sebastopol, is an organizationally independent leader in the effort to craft a costs that benefits the growers whose expertise has made California marijuana the most demanded weed on earth. “It’s great that a purple state like Colorado took the lead in legalization,” Figueroa explained, “because neither celebration in a presidential election wants to push away these voters. But now California has the most dedicated individuals, the most experience, and the best strains. We need to restore our leadership with the best legalization law.”

2015-01-06-CaliforniaAttorneyOmarFigueroa.jpg

California Lawyer Omar Figueroa (photo by Jonathan Greenberg)

San Francisco-based civil rights lawyer and prohibition reformer Matt Kumin, who helped California pass the first medicinal cannabis costs in 1996, agreed. “We have to take the lead like in ’96,” Kumin stated. “It’s great that we can find out from the mistakes of others, since this group is going to make it right.”

In 2010, California’s Prop 19, the “Regulate, Control & & Tax Cannabis Act,” was extensively criticized as weakly labelled, inadequately written, and not the result of a collaborative procedure. It pushed away lots of who work in “the market” by not considering their needs, like by developing stiff new fines for parents who smoked in their own yards.

Lindsay Robinson, director of development for the Cannabis Policy Job, believes that the title of a 2016 California bill ought to follow the winning messaging roadway paved by the Colorado expense, which her organization assisted get passed. Calling California’s procedure the “Control Cannabis Like Alcohol” Project might cut through the typically deceptive arguments of the opposition.

There was no agreement on the panel about a title for the 2016 procedure. Dale Sky Jones, Chair of the Coalition for Cannabis Policy is most likely to be at a main leader in the California effort, for which she was raising little donations after the panel. Jones recommended that the measure’s name might obtain a page from last month’s effective measure to launch 10,000 low level culprits from California prisons and make use of the millions conserved each year for public safety. “I liked the “Safe Communities, Strong Communities” title and we may wish to make use of something like that,” Jones stated.

Other problems that were raised consisted of whether the 2016 effort could attract hundreds of thousands of regional donors to replace financing from a couple of wealthy benefactors, the requirement for ecological obligation, and exactly what kind of amnesty to build in for the many thousands of “P.O.W.’s” of the war on cannabis. Some of the most experienced growers have felony convictions stemming from the outrage of marijuana. State-sanctioned grow licenses that exclude such felons were undesirable to many panelists. Expunging the records of such felonies would likewise remove barriers from numerous thousands of Californians unable to get licenses for occupations like property brokers and instructors.

Also in the mix: Legal pot bars. Mediator Amanda Reiman, the Berkeley-based Supervisor of Marijuana Law and Policy at the influential Drug Policy Alliance, noted that it made no sense to require Californians to just participate in personal homes. “If we’re going to regulate like alcohol, we should be able to consume like alcohol. We’ll absolutely fix that since that’s crazy!”